InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1547
Posts 7854
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/26/2010

Re: puthimaway post# 11780

Wednesday, 11/10/2010 10:02:02 PM

Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:02:02 PM

Post# of 12022
David Jerome Greene the attorney from Colorado?

From affidavit re: David Greene:

92. Heurung also alleges that in February and March 2010, Brian Langenbach and David Greene, an attorney from Colorado, reprinted 3.9 million bogus Petro shares. Heurung said that Greene went to the printer in Kansas City that Petro used and said Hawkins had given him permission to print the shares. Greene called Heurung and asked if he wanted some of the shares, and Heurung refused. Heurung said Greene is selling the shares for 10 to 20 cents a share. Greene wanted Heurung to draft a backdated letter stating the shares were legitimate. Heurung said he refused.

155. Of the $459,530 received from the sale of the shares, $105,000 was remitted to Brown, $118,000 was used by Langenbach to pay off existing business obligations, $118,000 was remitted to David Greene, a business partner of Langenbach. The remaining $118,000 was distributed to various individuals whom Langenbach believed to be in need of financial assistance.



David J. Greene
4465 Kipling Street
Suite 301
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Phone: 303-422-3937
Fax: 303-421-4309
Attorney Registration Number 08994
Admission Date: 09/29/1978

http://www.coloradosupremecourt.com/Search/Attdet.asp?Reg=8994

http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/80033-co-david-greene-1385765.html

People v. Greene, No. 02PDJ037. 6.13.02 Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge approved the parties’ Conditional Admission of Misconduct and suspended Respondent David J. Greene, attorney registration number 08994, from the practice of law for nine months all stayed upon successful completion of a two-year period of probation subject to conditions. In one matter, respondent failed to maintain funds subject to a Medicaid lien in a separate account, and in another matter, respondent tendered funds to the client which were due a provider and were subject to the provider’s lien in violation of Colo. RPC 1.15(a) and (b). Respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding.

http://www.coloradosupremecourt.com/PDJ/ConditionalAdmissions/Greene,No.02PDJ037,6.13.02,CA.PDF



By the way I don't think the Langenbach's were arrested. What happened is on Thursday the Final Order was signed by the Arizona Corporations Commission:

http://images.edocket.azcc.gov/docketpdf/0000119336.pdf

http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2010/11/09/20101109mesa-business-arizona-corporate-commission1109.html

http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_16566675

http://economy.kansascity.com/?q=node/8855

The Order does not preclude the commission from referring this matter to any government agencies for administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings. Nor does it preclude any other agency or officer of the state of Arizona or subdivisions from instituting administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings.

So it is possible they could face further legal issues from all of this in the future.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.