Gold, my point is Roche did gamble for 25 million on an obscure company. Abbott and Alere did a deal w/ Biocurex for DIAGNOSTICS NOT THERAPEUTICS, but you must admit that there is a much bigger payoff for treatment vs diagnosis. Isn't it now more enticing to proceed. One thing has nothing to do w/ the other. If you have discovered a way to destroy cancer, you have to have a way to get it specifically to those cells. The new patent and Dr Moro specifically says he does. Maybe Abbott or Alere all along did not want just a GPS to get to the cancer, they wanted the whole package. Do you know? Is Alere more likely to pay their royalty payment now? I don't know. I would think so after already investing a million dollars w/ us so far, and if Dr Moro can demonstrate that he is onto something huge. The broader picture remains unwritten as of right now, but somehow you have already written your own script, and even though the story is fluid, your's sticks to the same storyline. We'll have to see who's right. It's not over for Biocurex. On the contrary, it's a new beginning. Sorry to burst your bubble.
My second point on the collection of data was that there is absolutely, unequivocally no way that you know exactly what Dr Moro is working on, so for you to try and make me out to sound ridiculous, think again. We get it. You hate universal markers. You don't have to commit the rest of your life to show us your bias no matter what new evidence or technological advance utilizing a unique universal marker is presented.
