InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 45585
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 2638
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2000

Re: SPIN post# 33908

Saturday, 03/05/2005 9:58:11 PM

Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:58:11 PM

Post# of 45585
That was OLD NEWS!

In its reasoning, the SEC stated it had concerns over the adequacy of publicly available information concerning CMKX's assets and liabilities, mining and other business activities, share structure and stock issuances, and corporate management. Further, the SEC was concerned that CMKX may have unjustifiably relied on a Form S-8, filed in May 2003, to issue unrestricted securities and that CMKX and/or certain of its stockholders may have unjustifiably relied on Rule 144(k) of the 33 Act in conducting an unlawful distribution of its securities that failed to comply with the resale restrictions of Rules 144 and 145 of the Securities Act.

Tired of illegal trading? USE THIS:http://www5.lsb.state.ok.us/legislators/lsbaddress.asp

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.