Followers | 5 |
Posts | 580 |
Boards Moderated | 1 |
Alias Born | 02/13/2005 |
Friday, March 04, 2005 11:00:48 PM
The audit of 2003 has been delayed. I agree with King that the auditor probably wanted to wait until 2004 year end, then verify bank balances, accounts receivable, cash flow etc. Then, after a balanced set of books was attained, he/she could then effectively "back into" 2003 numbers by taking the end of 2004 balance sheet, subtract 2004 income statement and have the end of year 2003 balance sheet calculated.
In my opinion the delay is actually a positive from the standpoint that the auditor is exercising due diligence.
You also can't predict exactly when someone will answer the auditor's questions? Remember, the auditor sends questions to banks, suppliers, customers, etc. He/she will not complete the audit until they receive all or nearly all of the responses.
ILUS Provides an Update on the Binding Term Sheet Signed with Actelis Networks (NASDAQ: ASNS) • ILUS • May 31, 2024 12:52 PM
Element79 Gold To Provide Summary and Update on Active Exploration Program, Community Relations at RMEC on June 4 • ELEM • May 30, 2024 1:18 PM
Branded Legacy Secures Exclusive Extraction Partnership with One of the World's Largest Kava Distributors and Producers • BLEG • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
ECGI Holdings, Inc. Announces $2 Million Debt-to-Equity Conversion • ECGI • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM