InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2003

Re: j3pflynn post# 53119

Friday, 03/04/2005 10:40:27 AM

Friday, March 04, 2005 10:40:27 AM

Post# of 97650
Pacifica (virtualization technique) is absolutely not needed for dual core operation. So that digit-life quote is awkward at best:

"The new dual-core Athlon 64 solutions are to be shipping in H2 2005, however there are still some issues regarding the software. In particular, Pacifica technology called to provide compatibility with single-core CPU software is still in development and the deadline is not known yet."

This quote suggests Pacifica is essential for dual core Athlon 64 functionality. That's incorrect. Also Pacifica is not needed to provide compatibility with single-core CPU software. As long as all software running on the cpu is running on the same OS no virtualization technique is required. So this comment is awkward and misleading.

Pacifica is needed for most specifically for servers in case they need to run more than one OS on that server. As comparison: Intel's virtualization technology for x86 servers (Silvervale) isn't ready until next year. Intel does have client virtualization tech that is ready (Vanderpool).

Virtualization is seen as a key technology to lower TCO of servers. Intel does not have it working for x86 servers either. It's by far not as essential for clients.

Regards,

Rink



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News