InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 7117
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2010

Re: ImOnABoat post# 9226

Wednesday, 11/03/2010 1:30:47 PM

Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:30:47 PM

Post# of 91121
surebob will not be convinced by any amount of proof,as he has a vendetta as pointed out by others because of violation of some agreement w Bob apparently 5 years or so ago at Manzanillo-he previously suggested the pictures are fakes-dealing w such a person is only for entertainment value or to prevent nervous nellies from being overwhelmed by his vendetta.

As he did re Ensenada as a port,such people generally ignore the valid points we present that can't be refuted and attack the points on which they think they can buffalo us,since we haven't done research on CWRN 24/7 for 5 years.

BTW,re discussion about whether Ensenada is a deepwater port,the Wikipedia encylopedia says it is-as follows:

"Ensenada is the ONLY deep-water port in the state of Baja California and is part of standard shipping routes that directly link it with the Mexican cities of La Paz, Manzanillo, Mazatlán, Acapulco and Lázaro Cárdenas, as well as the U.S. cities of San Diego, Long Beach and Los Angeles, the Guatemalan city of Puerto Quetzal, the Chilean city of Valparaíso, the Japanese city of Yokohama and the Chinese city of Hong Kong."(emphasis added)

Although Manzanillo is a port also, I could not even find it among comparable listings of ports.

Elsewhere a deepwater port is that which can accommodate a fully loaded Panamax vessel(so named because it has been built to specs to allow transit of Panama canal-which at its shallowest has a depth of ca 40'). As per that definition,Mexico does not have one deepwater port along the entire pacific ocean,according to preliminary research.
vendetta's advantage is they have nothing better to do and it's had for honest people to match that timewise when you have other jobs,so they just try to wear you down w their misrepresentations,which take time to research to rebut.