InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,035.69
(
-1.57%
)
US TECH 100
16,929.20
(
-2.20%
)
Dow Jones
37,815.92
(
-1.49%
)
Brent Oil
85.90
(
-1.59%
)
Bitcoin
60,122.54
(
-5.82%
)
Post# of 75
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Fastball00

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 1068
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2004

Fastball00

Re: whassup post# 62

Thursday, 03/03/2005 5:00:03 PM

Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:00:03 PM

Post# of 75
What sandbox did you crawl out of! Your words have been tarnished with ulterior motives since their inception on this board.

In regards to your statement:

I would love to be a shareholder of a company in which the main owners, 95%, were compiled strictly of the President and CEO. This shows the strength of the company. A bulk of the shares are restricted through 2006, so they can not perform a reverse and that is not the intentions of management. The reason for such a large share structure is that of future and pending investments, which management controls. Also your comment on investments. I would prefer to acquire them at reduced costs and end up turning a substantial profit, in order to stay in business.

Your comments seem childish.


-F-


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up