MediaG3 (MDGC)

[beachsideeddy2]

What I liked about the Mesh Global splash page is that Wytec is displayed as part of the logo. This simply confirms that Wytech/Mesh Global/Mediag3 are all Val's creation. Which the past has shown mean absolutely nothing in terms of actual performance.

Next, IMO, they will next show their 'state of the art' facilities. Look close! There will be a couple of photos of a room with no workers, just 'equipment'. Then they'll show a couple of gizmo-looking products but will not give the FCC license numbers, etc. etc. They might even toss in a phrase, 'patent pending.' They had better really have something pending because to claim patent pending falsely is illegal and the penalty drastically increased.

28 U.S.C. 292 provides that the use of a patent number, or the words “patented” or something similar, on a product or in advertising for the product, is illegal if it is done with an intent to deceive the public into thinking that the product is patented when it actually is not. The same restriction applies to the use of terms such as “patent applied for” or “patent pending.” On December 28, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that the $500 penalty applies to each unit of a product that is sold with the false marking.

Want to hear more? Maybe about Unilava, MDGC's partner, and their flouting of the FCC? Maybe this is one reason the company has lost more than 98% of its value since March 2010.


The [FCC] agent called the contact telephone numbers on record for ICG/Corban, but the numbers were disconnected.

The agent later discovered that ICG/Corban had been dissolved in bankruptcy with no apparent transfer of ownership of the Tower.

An agent from the Atlanta Office inspected the Tower and found that the Tower lights were extinguished and that there was no electrical service to the Tower. There was no
ASR number posted at the Tower base,4 and no other signage indicating the owner of the Tower. The agent
received information from an individual living near the Tower, which led to the identity of the Tower’s owner.

That same day, the agent also notified an Operations Specialist with Telava that the Tower ownership
information must be updated in the ASR database.

The Atlanta Office received a response to the LOI,
signed by Telava’s Chief Operating Officer (“response letter”). The documents provided with the response letter showed that Telava purchased the Tower on November 1, 2006. The
response letter further stated that the Tower lights were extinguished when Telava purchased the Tower and
had remained extinguished since that date due to Telava’s failure to restore electrical service to the site.

One begins to wonder... MDGC's towers (if they are Mediag3's, since the corporation does not seem to have any towers registered to Mediag3) do not seem to be generating any income? Are any of them even powered? If so, how many?