InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1040
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2009

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 10/28/2010 1:42:51 AM

Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:42:51 AM

Post# of 42999
Mr. Haftel, you say:

I have the final and real report not the fabricated one that people on this board have been touting....The report I am quoting is dated December 20th, 2009

People on this board have not quoted a 'fabricated' report, but rather one posted on the EEGC website under 'Project Update':

http://www.empireenergy.com/pdf/Competent%20Persons%20Report-Part%201,%2023%20October%202008.pdf


Continuing our debate of many months ago, I can't speak to the existence or accuracy of a non-public report which you are touting, or the SEC regulations regarding dislosure (on your part) or non-disclosure (EEGC part) of significant material non-public information.

But, board members here have to ask the question. If this report is 'offical' and so favorable to EEGC, why is this Dec 20, 2009 report (no, Crazyjogger, not a new report) not on the EEGC website? It might have resulted in actual cash being invested in the Rights Offering, rather than the conversion of substantial undocumented (phantom) debt by insiders and resultant 50% dilution. Don't know where truth lies, regarding RPS Energy reports -- but there are obvious conflicts in play.

As a shareholder, I HOPE you are right about the SUBSTANCE of this non-public report -- but if you are, EEGC Directors will be subject to significant litigation, which will be very distracting.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.