InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 674
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/11/2010

Re: Vianna post# 164460

Thursday, 10/21/2010 1:48:29 PM

Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:48:29 PM

Post# of 221867
Thanks V. Anyway, I think a "Reverse Merger" is critical to completing this thing. As it is part of the means to the end. Not to mention that it confirms NMGLs intent to own 100% of both companies. What I find significant about it is that once all steps have been completed we will have the ability to trade our soon to be distributed Preferred "A" and "B" shares, and hopefully take profit in doing so. Or we can choose the alternative, that being to hold and wait for NMGL to sell. Which is ok, but I think the downside to that is time, and also, I do not see anything that states NMGL will sell both companies, or anything that states they would have to sell them both or to sell both at the same time. In fact if you read the redemption paragraph in the agreement it clearly tells us that they do not have to redeem all the shares at the same time. So, unless you don't mind possibly waiting and perhaps getting the div paid out in a piece meal fashion, then taking a less than expected profit may be an acceptable choice. Now don't take me wrong here, I'm not trying to put a negative spin on this thing, because I feel much more positive about this deal now than I have in a while. I'm sure we're going to see profits soon, I just fear that they wont be what allot of folks are expecting. JMO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.