InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,588.27
(
-1.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,336.00
(
-2.61%
)
Dow Jones
41,198.08
(
0.59%
)
Brent Oil
84.55
(
0.08%
)
Bitcoin
64,411.09
(
0.51%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Cougar6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Cougar6

Re: downsideup post# 37958

Tuesday, 10/19/2010 9:01:45 PM

Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:01:45 PM

Post# of 60937
Sorry, it was the only example I could think of. And that will be a question for the court to decide - were his actions merely the activities of a concerned lien-holder or were they material interference with our ability to pay. Again, you have the "but-for" issue - but for that action we could have paid. I think it opens some doors.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up