InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251721
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: pollyvonwog post# 106504

Monday, 10/18/2010 3:57:43 PM

Monday, October 18, 2010 3:57:43 PM

Post# of 251721
Re: Teva’s Lovenox

Thanks, pollyvonwog. As is probably clear from the prior posts in this thread, I believe that Teva is not playing with a full deck with respect to this matter. Let’s examine the statements by Teva’s IR department in more detail:

“It is well-known that we have partnered with another company regarding the product [Lovenox].”

I’ll bet that few if any sell-side analysts covering MNTA know this. If they did, they presumably would have mentioned it somewhere along the line when they opined as to the likelihood of Teva’s getting FDA approval.

“We are very pleased with our partner for generic Lovenox.”

Uh, huh. It’s been almost 7.5 years since Teva submitted its Lovenox ANDA. I can certainly see why they would be pleased with the outcome.

“I am not sure I understand why that would be consequential.”

This is IMO even more disingenuous than the statement above about being pleased. Unless the individual in Teva’s IR is completely out of the loop, he knows damn well why the identity of Teva’s partner is a consequential matter.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.