Thanks, pollyvonwog. As is probably clear from the prior posts in this thread, I believe that Teva is not playing with a full deck with respect to this matter. Let’s examine the statements by Teva’s IR department in more detail:
I’ll bet that few if any sell-side analysts covering MNTA know this. If they did, they presumably would have mentioned it somewhere along the line when they opined as to the likelihood of Teva’s getting FDA approval.
Uh, huh. It’s been almost 7.5 years since Teva submitted its Lovenox ANDA. I can certainly see why they would be pleased with the outcome.
This is IMO even more disingenuous than the statement above about being pleased. Unless the individual in Teva’s IR is completely out of the loop, he knows damn well why the identity of Teva’s partner is a consequential matter.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.