Remember, this is a civil trial, not criminal. In many states, the defendant gets to chose a split judgment if the plaintiff wins. I.e. Daic's laywer agrees to a 50-50 split in guilt. In that case, all CLYW has to prove is that the fault is 51% Daic's to win. That's the good news. The bad news is that whatever the judgment for money, CLYW gets only 51% of it. (Does anyone know if this also applies to Texas?)
Speculating on the trial and blue-skying feels good, but as Standish said in "The Flight of the Phoenix:" 'Courts move in mysterious ways. Sort of like God, but not nearly as generous.' I am NOT trying to put a damper on this board, but a reality check now and again is probably a good thing. I am a long (going on eight years) and my average cost per share is 4 cents, so I have the luxury of staying on board forever. From what I've seen over the years, I believe CLYW is about to come into some serious money. FWIW.