Midnight Think Tank

[WayneC777]

A MUST READ FOR EVERYONE IN THE U.S.:

Obama May Be In Deep Trouble...

Posted by Beyond Organics on October 5, 2010 at 3:00pm in Dinar

"THE BROOKS REPORT"

Obama May Be In Deep Trouble...

Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.

Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.

Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on.

And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'

Apparently, the Court has had enough.

The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven.

A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration.

Such a thing would be long overdue.

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.

And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.

The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.

In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.

The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.

And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.

Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.

Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.

That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.

The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.

A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE ON YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS LIST!!!

"Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics,........" Quoting from the article above: "...sources state that the Roberts court (U.S. Supreme Court) has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history...." go here for more on that: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ quoting therefrom: "JAMESBURG, NJ – (Sept. 30, 2010) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court ... on behalf of plaintiffs,..... challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the dismissal .... of plaintiffs’ lawsuit in which they charge that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, has NOT conclusively proven to any controlling legal authority that he is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 “natural born Citizen of the United States” and thus constitutionally eligible to serve as the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military, and that he has hidden all his early life records including his original long-form birth certificate, early school records, college records, travel and passport records needed to prove he is even a born Citizen of the United States..." and then there's this: http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams110.htm

MILITARY VETS UNIFY - PLACING OBAMA ELIGIBILITY ON FRONT BURNER

CONSIDER THIS:

Those of us who know a bit of history can sence and feel the storm brewing. Not since the so-called "Civil War" (DC war of aggression upon the States and constitution) has the united States of America been so polarized. Just three years prior to the "election" of "honest" Abe (the abolitionist, that'd be the constitution not slavery, study your history) Lincoln to the White House, the U.S. Supreme Court (composed of 8 Democrats and 1 Whig) ruled in the case of Dred Scot v. Sanford 319 How. 393 that those of African descent were not and could not be Citizens of the united States of America (several States united) as contemplated by the federal constitution. This was a long case and though the court ruled correctly, it caused a firestorm within the fire that had been burning over slavery, States' Rights, migration to the west & etc. since the constitution's ratification. The court's decision finally culminated with Abe's "election, CON-gress' further trampling of States' Rights and eventually the outbreak of hostilities between the "North" (CON-gress, northern antagonists & soon-to-be carpet-baggers) and South due exclusively to the South's attempts to peacefully secede and start over.

With the info above concerning Obama's alleged ineligibility to the Office of President and all the "racist" "Tea-bagging" constitutionalists out here that want him, his socialist policies and cronies removed from office and all of his blind supporters who haven't the faintest or simply don't care about the constitution, the rule of law and apparently the future of our supposed to be constitutional republic, IF any of these cases ever get to the U.S. Supreme Court properly and the court is forced to rule just as it was in 1857.... do you see the correlation? God forbid but the writing has been being put on the wall for a long time.

The elite, globalist pigs have been fomenting racial tensions in this country for many decades and now the first ***"Black" "president"*** is subject to removal from office by a white United States Supreme Court Chief Justice and white dominated Court. ***1st, he ain't black. He is of African descent, half white and half black, what used to be properly termed a Mulatto, before our society was overrun with political correctness. ***2nd, he ain't the President if he doesn't meet the minimal requirements under the federal constitution as is alleged and now before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Might get ugly out here. People's emotions sometimes overcome their sense of reason, what is right, the law, the constitution, everything. Obama's supporters particularly the "cracka-baby" killers have to be on an emotional high inundated with blatant ignorance just as Bush's supporters had to be, not only allowing but supporting him and CON-gress in their further demise of the constitution that Mr. Obama is simply duplicating exceedingly. The difference? Is Obama really a citizen as is required under the constitution........ and would his extremist "cracka-baby" killing "cracka" voter intimidating socialist liberal lunatic supporters go on a "Rodney King", New Orleans Katrina-style rampage should he be legitimately ordered to step aside by the U.S. Supreme Court? "The world may never know". My "suspicion"? Not only would they but it'd be..........................

"NATION-WIDE"
MUST