This guy, however, was doing the pumping, there being a fine line between being a pump or a proponent of an equity. Fonx obviously picked up on it. His prior posting record along with the fact that he has laid something rather heavy on us without any reference whatsoever as to how he came upon this information does not speak well for his case. What facts does he base his charges on? I would like to know and if he can validate them I would certainly add them to iHub’s more exacting and referenced list of questionable practices.
I don’t ague the need to find explicit and concrete answers to what many of us consider deception. That is exactly what we have been doing on iHub.
RCLRCL cites Aspen’s inablility to pay her bills, however, he does not offer any referenced data to substantiate exactly how Jack brought us to this place. Until he does he presents only insolvency as the enemy. He would incarcerate an abstract noun! (Thanks, Pilger)
RCLRCL thinks Jack is a crook, guess what, the courts don’t care.
We need to build an airtight case, not spew abstract rantings which will serve only to hurt our cause. Then reach for your pitchforks and light your torches.