InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 95
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/13/2004

Re: None

Tuesday, 02/22/2005 9:32:04 PM

Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:32:04 PM

Post# of 23263
IT is interesting to see that!

I think it was no slip of the tongue to state pr. from AMD legal counsel. I think it was intended to let all parties know just where AMD stands on intelectual property rights. It was a shot across the bow you could say.

This will be a real shot in the arm for Ptsc. But AMD also has been killed by Intel under selling them. Ptsc processor is cheap, fast and AMD will have the rights and the power to manufacture ,market and under bid Intel in applications where IGNITE WORKS BEST. AMD needs this processor.

All I can say is what a difference a day makes. Because in yesterdays post I stated I didn't give Ptsc much if any chance of ever delivering on selling products I STAND CORRECTED!!

What I would like Ptsc to do next is concentrate on getting in front of real wall street investment groups and sell their story. even if we had a market cap of 500mill we wouldn't be on anybodies radar screen on wallstreet. Not the big money anway.Its time for ptsc to pump it up a notch or two. They have a legit story know.

One thing that my bring more infringers to ptsc side instead of going with Moore would be tying a settlement in with a lic. deal for Ignite processors. Moore can't offer anything but a bill you owe me x amount of dollars to lic patent 336 thats it.

I hope we make a nice stead climb up in price higher highs and higher lows is the way it works best.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News