| Followers | 516 |
| Posts | 6869 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 01/24/2008 |
Friday, October 01, 2010 2:00:29 PM
Nice post.
"also, keep up with their RAL funding. The removal of the debt indicator may make a little trouble with increasing their funding for this year...."
This was why I was wondering why no mention of this issue as an INDUSTRY issue and not just a JTX problem. You've addressed that now with the RAL's going away comment below thanks.
This is the reassuring first post?
so thats what its all about......the PPS had to be in accordance with NYSE limits or it would be delisted. Time was running out to comply.....it got pumped up to meet the requirements or was it the post afterwards?
Okay now for the nice part, sorry for being skeptical and or critical on approach...I've seen it all on I-Hub with subtle misinformation to pure blatant mis-truths to innocent oversight.
I believe you mean well and I appreciate your input as I now seem to have another knowledgeable person to share info and mutual interest with here. But I do keep it real...tee hee.
I'm also very private about myself and what I share about what I KNOW about this company for A REASON.
The world knows who is the #1 tax preparer but this the JTX board and other company symbols and constant posts mentioning of what HRB does even if subtle will disappear. With that disclaimer said, it is good to have you on onboard Greg but no smack talking about HRB vs. JTX...it hits too close to home.
You also know we are both (HRB and JTX) in a market share battle with the "ticker symbol" IRS who would not have us in business at all if it was up to them IMO.
On the stock side this would be a good level of support which we know now must be supported if the stock is to remain to be listed so can you say BOTTOM?
have a great weekend and I look forward to your continued input,
DD22
"also, keep up with their RAL funding. The removal of the debt indicator may make a little trouble with increasing their funding for this year...."
This was why I was wondering why no mention of this issue as an INDUSTRY issue and not just a JTX problem. You've addressed that now with the RAL's going away comment below thanks.
This is the reassuring first post?
so thats what its all about......the PPS had to be in accordance with NYSE limits or it would be delisted. Time was running out to comply.....it got pumped up to meet the requirements or was it the post afterwards?
Okay now for the nice part, sorry for being skeptical and or critical on approach...I've seen it all on I-Hub with subtle misinformation to pure blatant mis-truths to innocent oversight.
I believe you mean well and I appreciate your input as I now seem to have another knowledgeable person to share info and mutual interest with here. But I do keep it real...tee hee.
I'm also very private about myself and what I share about what I KNOW about this company for A REASON.
The world knows who is the #1 tax preparer but this the JTX board and other company symbols and constant posts mentioning of what HRB does even if subtle will disappear. With that disclaimer said, it is good to have you on onboard Greg but no smack talking about HRB vs. JTX...it hits too close to home.
You also know we are both (HRB and JTX) in a market share battle with the "ticker symbol" IRS who would not have us in business at all if it was up to them IMO.
On the stock side this would be a good level of support which we know now must be supported if the stock is to remain to be listed so can you say BOTTOM?
have a great weekend and I look forward to your continued input,
DD22
Protect Your Valuables...especially your Jewels...
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
