InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 926
Posts 30344
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 07/13/2010

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/28/2010 7:22:37 AM

Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:22:37 AM

Post# of 10444
Morning all. A quick post before I run the kids off to school and head into work.

Tadaa, I agree that most times, those R/S announcements are no good for pps. Time and time again you will see pps go to no-bid once that is announced. With ZIPZ, we've just been there.

The smaller float is likely to lump ZIPZ into 'tiny float play' category. For example, IF*R did an R/S and pps went from something like .0009 to no-bid. Once the deed was done, pps was at approx. .0065 post-R/S and ran to .04 on no news. It is only now (a month later approx.) that it is back to post-split prices.

Thing is with the R/S's, it can be a self-fulfilling proffesy. People panic and sell and pps goes down like anticipated.

Now, back to ZIPZ, most panicking and wanting out likely already sold and / or prepeared for the reality this was not going to move for a while. Now, if those holders continue to hold post R/S and we get news, ZIPZ should realize some nice gains. You and I right now realize why it may be moving, but as that occurs, it is only then more might see that the float size is having an impact.

Trying to put it all into perspective.

Lastly, that news is bizzare...following their refute of same? That's crazy!!! Wondering why?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.