InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 105
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2010

Re: King Shaka post# 27531

Thursday, 09/23/2010 10:55:16 AM

Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:55:16 AM

Post# of 59551
The " new package " which was submitted was not a new package at all. In reviewing the existent package the new review team found a great deal of superflous information, which was requested by the old team, which was fired. They continuosly asked why such information was included. They were told it was requested by the previous team. Janes voluntered to reannotate the package and send a separate package which encompassed information on how to carry the device downstairs (among other nonsense). They ( the new team) expressed appreciation for Janes effort in doing so. Janes specifically asked if his action would set the clock back. They responded with an emphatic no. I invite you to call the company for verification of such. Additionally, Janes has called the new team, at least twice, asking if they required additional information or had any other questions. Both times their response was "we have everything we need and you are under active review". Does this mean that approval will come in the near future? In my opinion, yes. I encourage you to call the company and verify such. On the other hand, if you simply don't believe anything they tell you and prefer to speculate on concealment of materially significant information and don't believe anything, anyone from IMGG tells you, don't bother to call.