gregs, I call it how I see it, but your rebuke inspired me to look again, and I found I was in error.
While I had generally respected your content, I believe that your emotion towards Wavoids colors your perceptions immeasurably. You used to speak directly towards things like chip cycles and things I thought were relevant. Now you talk about Snakcman. That was your choice and not mine and it durably amends my impression of your content. That is simply the case. I call it how I see it.
My hollow statement was based on my perception of a timeline regarding your statements on delisting. I have reviewed that content. I am in error. You made no significant posting regarding delisting after my short essay on the criteria for delisting notifications and their subsequent actions. At the time I read it, I believed you made incongruent statements on WAVXNOTES and WAVX. My review indicates I was in error.
I still believe the quality of your content in that venue has been eroded (and eroded due to the successful attempts by Wavoids Zealots to silence and/or distract you from topic-worthy content).
In summation, I have recently found your content in that arena to be "hollow". I do not intend to cause personal offence. There is other content of yours which I have admired.
To quote you:
[I'm] "on these boards to learn and to make money, not to win respect or popularity contests."
Regards,
Dig Space.
The above content is my opinion.
AI
