Yeah I'm still here to. Glad to see you are aswell wabadon. Watching this stock put me to sleep temporarily. I had really hoped the public relations contract had been executed and along with that the increased exposure and interest. As aggrivating as it is that no news comes out it is also obvious in past financials that we are making good gains financially as a company. It is my personal opinion the doc has our best interests at heart and seldom , if ever, spends money recklessly.
There is a missing piece of the puzzle that goes along with what i wrote about the possibility of this one having been short sold. I'm just going by memory here so the exact details may not match what i'm saying but the point will be made.....( you'd have to read the sho regulations part yourself to find it, i'm not going to read it again at this time) I did post where to find it in one of my previous posts.
While researching naked short selling and learning about that there is a stipulation about the condition of the company that causes people who short sale to follow regulations... basically it was after an ipo becomes a publicly traded company or something to that effect. Now, if the definition of a publiclly traded company is one who has traded for a certain time period or what i don't know but that was a loophole i noticed and if that were indeed the law the potential there is for short or naked short sold shared that occur during a companies infancy that may remain outstanding till a short squeeze does occur. I know from looking on the otcmarket site at various companies and what little short sale info they provide that i have seen one that had shorted shares that were in excess of 140 days and there was no flag. (that in my mind leads me to believe that possiblity of the loophole i mentioned)
I know i'm not the only one who noticed starting several months back when we were actually trading on a regular basis just not always a large dollar amount that the larger trades going through were well above the ask and at the end of the day it would be a small trade taking it back down yet again. Even yesterday or whenever, 2,000 @ 0.012 yeah that person wanted out for $24 before commission, lol. Just think what you would do if you had 5 million shares shorted and the possibility for that loophole does exist. You could sit on those and stew for years if needed always hoping for and maybe even selling 2,000 shares here and there to discourage people who have shares to sell them so get you out of this situation. (there are what? about 3 million shares unaccounted for?) The quantities here are irrelevant in this scenario. Could have only 1 million shorted or whatever but this company (supposedly noone knows about) will begin trading very rapidly the very moment news comes out every time: i say it's someone covering their position or at least that is what makes the most sense to me.
I want this stock to trade at it true value as much as anyone but we need good numbers and news to force the squeeze if it does indeed exist. One thing i found while browsing for info, a site called quantcast.com it shows quantity hits for websites; for rbrm's the traffic had grown significantly over the past 6 months though it was dropping off some. Also on rbrm's website i've noticed it no longer has an investors link and it mentions being a division of RBRM, we have other divisions? That about the extent of any food for thought i have at this point.
AI
