Anyone else wondering why someone ponying up 20 million bucks would want to do biz with the current regime of CTGI officials?
With the exception of Kurtz, who doesn't seem to figure too prominently in LTC's future based on recent PR's, which one of these guys has any professional experience in their respective field to justify keeping them on board?
For example, if you were putting up the dough and you really thought that CCTI was the going to hit big, why on earth would you want Bruce Jones to captain the ship? What scientific expertise does he bring to the topic? What other credentials does he bring to the venture other than he was the guy working under Don Robbins when DR bought the technology?
IMO, LTC is still the big enchilada here. The perspective new team wasn't flown to Canada to see emissions scrubbing in practice; our shares were diluted so that they could be flown to the Ukraine to see LTC in action. And they returned convinced enough to run the LTC show (for an unknown fee/stake I should add) but not convinced enough to put up the money themselves.
To add to all the speculation about the CTGI future, I doubt that much, if any money will be directed to CCTI. And I seriously doubt that any financiers want to underwrite Bruce Jone's search for a profitable company.
