InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 124
Posts 9546
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/08/2010

Re: A deleted message

Monday, 09/13/2010 12:12:56 PM

Monday, September 13, 2010 12:12:56 PM

Post# of 173216
I am very confident. The noteholders were under contract that did not include the damages that plaintiffs are claiming. Lenders have no right to inside information and can only collect what is due by agreement for the loan. Think about it, they want more because Briscoe had this NAK partnership on the table, a partnership they did not know about. Then again, where did the note holders think the the payoff money came from? This whole case is the biggest joke I have ever heard. Noteholders were left holding the assets in lieu of payment in full, with enterest. The warrants are restricted in value by contract as well. I see no case here.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News