InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1040
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2009

Re: Howardhaftel post# 17820

Thursday, 09/09/2010 7:02:04 PM

Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:02:04 PM

Post# of 42999

he may consider using it ($50M LOC) when his back is against the wall but its obvious it isn't.

His personal back may not be against the wall, but with Hunt matter coming to court in three business days, the space between EEGC and the wall is paper thin.

Hopefully they can settle in advance with no need to go to the LOC.

But, I do disagree on the $50M LOC versus $180M from Sure:

- $50M would easily enable enough drilling to determine if there are commercial hydrocarbons, at which time

- Financing would be a lot cheaper than what Sure is attempting to place -- interest PLUS (per the Agreement) an as yet undisclosed, and perhaps unnegotiated) percentage of gross profit.

If the $50M LOC were truly available, it would certainly seem to be in Mr. Bendall's financial best imterest to use it first given his confidence in the geology.

Perhaps that is where the $12M will come from?

BTW, I fully agree with you and other posters that the LOC is Mr. Bendall's to use as he sees fit; but when he talks about its availability in an EEGC press release, he is certainly creating an impression he will use it to benefit EEGC.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.