DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[worktoplay]

Henny Penny...I see that easybake dug up a colleague from the Phantom Fiber board (or from his archive of alias'). It is admirable of you to come to her rescue, but rather than clarify you seem to be adding to the misinformation that easy has been "baking" up. For instance you said:

In this particular case it was most likely written and distributed to the local press and then the PR was followed up with a pitch. This could have happened before or after the "event."

Now, truth be told, you have no idea WHAT article you're talking about, nor what PR she (easybake) is talking about. Being as this is your first post on this board, I suppose I could cut you some slack. However, because you apparently came here to continue "baking", I'll have to ask you to reevaluate your position. Consider this a test of your honesty and sincerity. And I'll even provide the article so you can further evaluate your position:

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YgTvAplDsMcJ:www.bradenton.com/mld/bradentonherald/2005/01/23/n....

Now, my challenge to you is to take an unbiased read of this article and tell the board whether you still believe it was "In this particular case it was most likely written and distributed to the local press and then the PR was followed up with a pitch."

Thanks darling...

Later,
W2P