InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 558
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/22/2009

Re: rocky301 post# 24187

Wednesday, 09/08/2010 2:13:12 PM

Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:13:12 PM

Post# of 92948
Good discussion here Rocky, and that is a great article that you and Louisa discussed.

The NED process is certainly a "grayish" area as far as the harm that may or may not be done. If there was a clearcut, simple way of showing that no embryo is subject to ANY potential harm, I think the NIH would have jumped on it more decisevely.

This recent lawsuit certainly gives us an interesting position. I imagine the NIH would much prefer to get rid of the DW Amendment nonsense, and then go through with the redefinition, rather than limit funding to only ACTs NED lines. I agree with those that are saying the NED process is like a last resort, as far as the NIH sees it.

Furthermore, I would like to read those 2 journal articles that Lanza referenced in the Lanza paper, if I ever have the time.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.