I certainly hope that Mr. Haftel's last week posts about financing being a 'done deal,' and the September 6 post about the first part of the $180M in Sure Asset Management financing being in EEGC coffers within 'a week or so' are accurate. Should get feedback on those pretty soon, hopefully prior to the hearing. Maybe the hearing can be postponed to allow for the 'or so.'
I won't try to go back and analyze the accuracy of past posts, too many. I would observe that the one 3 September about Hunt Energy 'retracting' their request for wind-up turned out not to be accurate -- the advertisement appeared on the 7th. However, perhaps that was semantics -- we certainly all hope Hunt and GSLM can resolve their differences before the September 14 hearing, four business days from now so that Hunt can then 'retract' their request for wind-up.
It is also useful to recall that Mr. Haftel has said in the past he does not have 'inside information,' so we should not expect complete accuracy in posts about the future.
For myself, I base my posts on analysis of the company's published information, combined with personal business experience. I post when I see inaccurate or illogical analysis; important we be grounded.