![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/189764.png?cb=1593717569)
Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:57:48 PM
Do you know how much it cost the company to buy back the 10M shares or so in 2006/2007 from Barnett (At least that is one amount he PRs about. No idea how many other shares he also bought back.) Remember, that is when he had to issue himself the free preferred super voting shares so he could protect us from Lanza after he lost the majority because of buying back his shares.
Who says this company has been better off with Barnett instead of Lanza anyway? Is this a lesser of two evils kind of thing? Why couldn't the shareholders vote in somebody who was good at running the company? That's rhetorical, because the obvious (IMO) answer is that way Barnett couldn't manipulate this company to his personal needs.
I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM