Thursday, September 02, 2010 6:24:19 PM
Ask them these questions.
1) Is that device De nova device? Or the new fda proposal(class IIb device?)
2) Is that coming under existing product code or need to be reclassified.
3) Is there a predicate available?
4) Is there data available to check safety and efficacy of the data? Did they request performance data?
2008 and 2009 is the worst years for fda clearance on rediation devices and not for NEPH related industry - (purifier related)
something wrong in there.
I know, in recent boston medical devices & FDA meet some one was complaining about one PACS software system was awaiting approval news for almost 22 months. one or few here and there. But not a lot.
In IMGG case, it is the last stage which verifies performance data. After April 5th submission, FDA and Dean has been interacting very well and communication is the key.
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM