InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: mikenickels post# 21430

Thursday, 02/10/2005 2:26:06 PM

Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:26:06 PM

Post# of 82595
mikenickels, If it's not just fluff, then it is pretty discouraging news.

$40,000 to carry out a validation of Retinome. Think of the questions that raises.

Isn't Retinome already validated?

Has it been released without sufficient validation?

If it has already been validated, why does the Australian Government not accept the data, why does it need to be redone?

$40,000 dollars, gimme a break, can't DNAP perform it's own validation and present the results in such a way as to satisfy those involved without approaching them with hat in hand for such a paltry handout?

Doesn't appear to be the behavior of a major player, does it?

Let's hope it was just fluff...what do you think?

regards,
frog