InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1971
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/01/2010

Re: Biochemist2002 post# 93089

Wednesday, 09/01/2010 3:23:05 PM

Wednesday, September 01, 2010 3:23:05 PM

Post# of 233166
wowo did you just prove the PR was a reactive FLUFF to yesterdays collapse. Perhaps they were so quick to fire it out they forgot to research the prior PRs to make sure they are not fibing a little to settle all the noise.

you may have just verified my thoughts that this PR is meaningless and strictly put out to stop the bleeding.

my glass is still half full but sure looks fishy to me.