InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 335
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2003

Re: alj14 post# 17785

Thursday, 02/10/2005 9:58:17 AM

Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:58:17 AM

Post# of 341724
>> The central point at issue in my recent tussle with StehSucker was that he continues, over and over again, to hypothesise a reverse split, claiming that there is "no other option". <<

I didn't begin the reverse thread, I was simply trying to help provide some clarity/insight as someone asked for it on the subject... then you attacked me personally.

There IS the option of remaining with too many shares outstanding, it's just not the BEST option. Management has finally seen the light but I believe it's more due to listing requirements that good sound corporate governance.

>> If I was asked to name one point on which the policy of management has been clearly defined, it is that. No reverse splits. It's a point of honour on the mental horizon of management. <<

What you say is true to a point. Check with your "sources" and I believe you will be apologizing to me. Things change, especially with this company.

If you guys want to end the war of words, that's fine by me, I'd rather discuss whats going on with the company anyway since my 250 shares I really hold are so important to me... thats sarcasm in case you missed it.