Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:58:17 AM
I didn't begin the reverse thread, I was simply trying to help provide some clarity/insight as someone asked for it on the subject... then you attacked me personally.
There IS the option of remaining with too many shares outstanding, it's just not the BEST option. Management has finally seen the light but I believe it's more due to listing requirements that good sound corporate governance.
>> If I was asked to name one point on which the policy of management has been clearly defined, it is that. No reverse splits. It's a point of honour on the mental horizon of management. <<
What you say is true to a point. Check with your "sources" and I believe you will be apologizing to me. Things change, especially with this company.
If you guys want to end the war of words, that's fine by me, I'd rather discuss whats going on with the company anyway since my 250 shares I really hold are so important to me... thats sarcasm in case you missed it.
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Unitronix Corp. Publishes Its Cryptocurrency Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Nov 14, 2024 8:05 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM