InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1001
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: pauly3 post# 12438

Tuesday, 08/31/2010 12:46:57 PM

Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:46:57 PM

Post# of 23270



The patent statute (35 U.S.C. § 282) indicates that an issued patent is “presumed valid” and that the “burden of establising invalidity” rests with the party asserting invalidity. The Federal Circuit has held that the presumption of validity is properly realized by a clear and convincing standard. The Supreme Court has not directly ruled on the issue. However, in KSR v. Teleflex, the Supreme Court did note that the “the rationale underlying the presumption — that the PTO, in its expertise, has approved the claim — seems much diminished” in cases where the patentee “fail[ed] to disclose” the key prior art to the PTO.

By Dennis Crouch

http://www.patentlyo.com/microsoft.i4i.certpetition.pdf

The BIGGIES are still greedy,and selfish..They want it all..

The prior art 'scrutiny', has been exhausted..

There is NO longer,any doubt about validity.. This is,
ALL about MONEY..

Peace..





Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News