InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 430
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/27/2010

Re: ScubaDiver post# 25049

Tuesday, 08/31/2010 10:43:02 AM

Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:43:02 AM

Post# of 61041
It's hard to tell what is truth and what isn't. We have the past to look back on, which has ONE R/S in it. It's just one R/S, so hardly can we call it a pattern of cheating investors out of their money, but it's enough for some to worry about that. There's also some trouble that the an employee has gotten into with the SEC (I think it was the SEC) over 18 years ago. Again, both of these are single examples, and hardly patterns. Furthermore, it's still just inductive reasoning. This forum has more theorizing than it has solid answers. I'm not planning to exit my position based on inductive reasoning, that was formed through the use of a single past instance. It's one thing to say that the sun will come up tomorrow because it has for my entire life time, but it's another to say that I will trip over a stick tomorrow because I have tripped over one today.

Still holding, until all my money is gone. Even then, I guess I'm technically still holding lol.