InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1432
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/03/2009

Re: None

Sunday, 08/29/2010 11:36:55 PM

Sunday, August 29, 2010 11:36:55 PM

Post# of 118239
they changed intial business to our buisness. this is how it read when it was discovered here on august 16th. alot of references to rcch also missing no 40,000 fee for essman, just that they r retaining him:



Our Initial Business

"We believe that we have an advantage in that we have been assigned the legal claim of companies that we believe have been unlawfully injured. RCC Holdings Corporation (“RCC”) is a public company controlled by our principals. (See Conflicts of Interest”). RCC's sole subsidiary is IWS Water Solutions, Inc. (“IWS”). We believe that RCC and IWS have valid claims against short sellers and others for tortuous interference with business relations and corporate defamation. (See Attachment A Legal/Attorney Letter of Intents and letters of authorization for SSI). Twenty percent of any recovery on these claims will be paid to the companies involved."

Operations

We will employ staff to research allegations and companies. We will do background work on possible client cases. We will employ staff to interface with investigators and attorneys to manage cases and minimize costs and time.

We have contracted to retain the law firm of Bradley E. Essman to handle our first case. We may also employ a former official of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other investigators on this case. We will pay the Essman law firm a retainer of $40,000 in order to begin the investigation and prosecution of the case involving RCC and IWS.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.