InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2010

Re: xclr8r post# 121031

Friday, 08/20/2010 7:33:41 PM

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:33:41 PM

Post# of 131532
Good to see the open conversation.
I gotta thank XQ. Thanks X, We'll move on from here.

My focus was directed towards him because he sits in the highest seat for this board. He and I had discussed this and right now I think there are bigger things to discuss. AKA the economy and future of new brokerage services.

Outside of that, I only wish there had been a hard factual dissenting point of view on the board when I was watching my investment in INIX go from green to red, or before I hit the button even. The lowering in PPS is what made me dig deep and eventualy start posting. I had followed INIX and the board for months prior.
There was "one" dissenting view out there but I didnt really notice untill I started my postings. Up till then I was more interested in reading where we "should" be going vs where we "might" be going. It is human nature to side with what one wants to hear vs anything outside the mass view.

Id rather deal with the reality than pretend with the fantasy. I fell in love with a stock a long time ago and got burnt out of a huge profit. I was lucky to have taken my initial + some pennies out near a high.
Not listening to the reality based views I let my profit dwindle to almost nothing. I learned a hard lesson.

Im sorry if it looks like I am "picking" on people or diminishing their fantasy about INIX but I have learned to read both sides and right now the side I see still has more red than green.(short of painting) I was thinking earlier this year that 2nd or 3rd and 4th Q's we would be reading sub numbers from Realtime... I didnt think it would die out as early as it did but I did have an idea it might not be as profitable as many thought. Just read my very first post.

I will continue to call out the "we should be's" and the "INIX ready to pop'rs". While many investors may like to see a day or 2 of green, they are taking their 2-3 hundred bux and not looking back. I would like to see a decent pump with out all the bs and lies even that we have seen in the past couple of weeks but I dont think the 2 go together. A decent pump minus the bs, do they make such a thing?

I myself, can not call the company an infant because of the "new" management, the products have been there. I will call it restructured though....
This is where I used the "too much too little too late" phrase at. Imagine INIX at this point being in business towards the end of 2002. Now that would have been a "too the moon'r" no doubt.
Unfortunately it is 2010. From here I get political, dats a no no ha. For the most part I can back all my numbers and 95% of my understandings on the workings of the company. I just want others to do the same as I will continue to ask.

I hope this gives you a better understanding of where I am coming from. ?

:)

NOW, wheres that confounded Q2?