Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[SJOGRINGO]

IR REsponse August 19, 2010 4:36 PM


Re: "William" ... what can you tell us??
Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:57 PM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified [e-mail]>
To: "IR QUASAR AEROSPACE" <ir@quas araerospace.net>

Evening "William".

Thanks again for the timely response.

Yes, I was aware you would have no problem with posting your comments from prior posted IR responses. In reality, you probably welcome the information being available to the shareholder community saving multiple replys. You being a trained professional are very careful with your words and neither of us wants even the slightest hint that "special" information is being exchanged.

GRIEF... What Grief... If anyone misinterpreted your comments..they did so by design and for other motives.

I am sure you have noticed on IHub the reappearance of many of the old Negative Ned's This has me very excited, especially with the addition of a few new extremely Negative Ned's.

One even posting what seems like 20 hours a day... great life, but shows to me that there will be lots of activity in QASP in near future.

Looking forward to the press releases and transparency with the new Operating Management team . Hopefully you will be in a position very soon to answer many of the stockholder questions that have been presented.

Don't let the Negative Ned's get to you... they are being very well compensated..one way or another..

Keep up the good work!

Peace,

xxxx

--- On Thu, 8/19/10, IR QUASAR AEROSPACE <[e-mail]> wrote:


From: IR QUASAR AEROSPACE <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: "William" ... what can you tell us??
To: [e-mail]
Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010, 4:36 PM


Mr xxxxx,

The meeting was very positive.The new team is open to positive ideas and is very aggressively pursuing Mr Bradleys dream.
I still cannot give any information on funding,audits, or acquisitions until a couple of press releases are issued,but I am extremely pleased with everything that I am hearing and seeing.
By the way.It was brought to my attention that one of my responses to you was released on IHUB,which I have no problem with,but it looks like several shareholders took it as a negative.That was never my intention.When I said that I will address your (and my) frustration with them,I meant that I will address the frustation with our situation with them ,not at them.In other words ,I wanted them to know we are frustrated with the lack of information available ,such as acquisition information,audited financial s, transparency,press releases, that kind of thing ,not frustration with them as managers and officers.I just wanted to share shareholder feelings with these issues,not directed at the new team just as information.They want to know how shareholders feel and what is expected of them and they are extremely receptive to your ideas as a shareholder.I am very exited about our potential future.
I apologize to you if I confused you with my wording. I should have done a better job and do not worry ,I am not a bit upset about you posting my response.I expect all of my responses to be posted.
I hope you post this one to help clear up any confusion that I may have caused and once again, I am very sorry if I caused you or any shareholder any grief.
I am sorry for getting back to you so late.It has been a very long and productive day today.
Have a great day and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:05 PM, xxxxxxyahoo.com> wrote:


Mr William IR...

Morning or afternoon again...

What can you tell us about todays meeting..???


xxxx
xxx xxx xxxx