InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,968.80
(
-1.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.27
(
1.49%
)
Bitcoin
60,113.88
(
-4.82%
)
Post# of 22746
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

wizardseye

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 82
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2010

wizardseye

Re: TEX post# 20931

Thursday, 08/19/2010 12:04:53 PM

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:04:53 PM

Post# of 22746
It is what it is. I was merely pointing out that on Aug. 17, 2010, there were 85,000 shares short interest. I wouldn't consider that to be high. Only that it exists. The link to the post was very interesting, and confirmed a long time suspision of mine, that anything the govt. does isn't meant for us mere mortals to understand. I think the volume for ACLH on 8/17/10 was 93,500, so according to the article, the 85,000 shares short are just orders that weren't complete. Am I understanding this right?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up