Fuen - first of all, thank you for your response. I appreciate that.
The challenge IBCS faces is to find the way to rise above the pit it's falling into. Right now, without affiliates, without some immediate "next big thing" to turn to, the company is stuck in a position where it can't really attract any "names" in terms of well know talk show hosts from other radio networks and it because it has no affiliates, it can't attract any real national or even regional advertisers. It has no Arbitron ratings to see to anyone.
So it gets stuck having to run "PI" (Per Inquiry) ads for companies that may or may never pay IBCS for any leads it might generate for those companies.
Then IBCS is forced to find sponsors for the stock talk shows that can only barter goods or pass out shares of their own stocks, which tend to be in many cases, worse off than IBCS.
Despite showing pictures, on its website photo gallery, of 3-4 people who allegedly do the "voices" and "voice-overs" for IBCS, the company does not have anyone in management with any radio experience - not as talent or as management. That would explain the folly of signing up for some much unused satellite broadcast time. An experienced broadcast team would have avoided that pitfall right from the start.
None of the Flemings or the Nethers had any prior experience in broadcasting before the formation of IBCS. Forming a network, even when you have a room full of broadcasters with years of experience, is still a challenge beyond belief, but to attempt to create one with nobody who has any real broadcast experience is absolutely scary.
So when you scrape away all the shouting, cursing and hysteria on any of these stock forums and just look at the company in as disinterested a way as possible, then IBCS looks terminally ill.
AI
