Encounter Development Technologies Inc. (ENTI)

[negativenumbers]

Why would an artist or group use MMX for $10/mo when they could pay $10/mo or $60/year for Vimeo and get the same amount of storage, way more exposure, video quality that is 1000x better than what MMX offers. They also get video statistics and changeable user permissions. You also get an interface that is very aesthetically pleasing, easy to navigate, easy to search, and professional looking.

Let us compare Vimeo's quality to MMX with the same music video,

http://vimeo.com/12671339

http://www.musicmatrix.com/videos.php?te_class=gallery_media&te_mode=view&te_key=24677

You can't really compare the two...if you say otherwise you're either legally blind or in denial.

If they don't accomplish anything within 1 year are you still going to defend them and blindly stand behind them like you do? Just curious. I think you need to wake up and smell the flowers.

MusicMatrix is their income, MusicMatrix has had ZERO visible progress. Having piss-poor quality EMI and Warner clips dumped to the site is not progress. The contest banner is not progress. Button icon changes is not progress. There has been zero done to the one entity that is going to bring in users/revenue and we're all worried about this SP. If Jimi Hendrix rose from the dead and exclusively marketed MusicMatrix.com it would not change the fact that the site is abysmal in design/color and technology it uses. Go look at some other video sharing websites, do your own shopping and then go back to MusicMatrix. You'll notice how amateur'ish MMX is and how much work it actually needs to become acceptable by the 'mainstream'.