InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252496
Next 10
Followers 832
Posts 119982
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 100642

Wednesday, 08/04/2010 6:18:21 PM

Wednesday, August 04, 2010 6:18:21 PM

Post# of 252496
Telaprevir vs Boceprevir in First- and Second-Line Settings


SVR in best SVR in SVR iHub
Trial design Setting Acronym treatment arm control arm Delta reference

SoC ± Telaprevir 1st-line ADVANCE *75% (n=362) 44% (n=369) 31% #msg-50595752
Soc ± Boceprevir 1st-line SPRINT-2 †66% (n=366) 38% (n=366) 28% #msg-52949888

SoC ± Telaprevir 2nd-line PROVE-3 ‡53% (n=151) 14% (n=151) 39% #msg-48759554
Soc ± Boceprevir 2nd-line RESPOND-2 †66% (n=134) 21% (n=134) 45% #msg-52949888


* ‘12+12’ arm. (SVR in ‘8+16’ arm was 73%.)

† 48w arm with 4w lead-in on SoC alone. (SVR in ‘response-guided’ arm
was 63% in SPRINT-2 and 59% in RESPOND-2.) No breakdown of patients
by response to first-line treatment is available for RESPOND-2 at this time.

‡ ’24+24’ arm. (SVR in ‘12+12’ arm was 51%.) 57% of patients were prior
non-responders, 7% were prior breakthroughs, and 36% were prior relapsers.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.