InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 883
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2009

Re: Realityhurts post# 12252

Monday, 08/02/2010 1:24:47 PM

Monday, August 02, 2010 1:24:47 PM

Post# of 13553
True, MG*N is a piece of spit.

It's a horrible comparison because both companies are complete pieces of spit, but the point I was trying to make (albeit not a great one) is that a RS is almost always seen as a negative and will lead to a drop in price (after the RS from the new PPS). Therefore, I was pointing out that MG*N had that reverse split (and it should have lead them to drop a lot from the price after the RS which it did, but we didn't even need that negative RS to drop down to the point we are at today.... it is really sad that now both MG*N and MEVT are at the same levels and MEVT didn't even need the negativity of a RS to reach those levels, we found other ways to be a really spitty company with a really slimy management. Most MEVT investors were expecting more from this management rather than them turning out to be scumbags like the management in MG*N.

Take it for what it is, a pointless and crappy comparison (sorry) because both companies are pretty crappy in their own rights anyway. All I was trying to do was point out that no one would have expected MEVT to be at the same level as MG*N 8 months down the road (even with MG*N's RS)..... and yet here we are. It is truly dissapointing on MEVT's side (nothing really to do with MG*N except another way to measure our progress by comparing our PPS to theirs).

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.