InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 103
Posts 10409
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2006

Re: Nikodemos post# 42679

Thursday, 07/29/2010 1:39:51 PM

Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:39:51 PM

Post# of 173013
Hey Niko, sorry you feel your questions weren't included. I felt we had included them but in a briefer form. Specifically, you asked:

Here are 2 concerns of mine for now:

[] Why has the company chosen a T/A, or instructed the T/A, NOT to provide R/S info? Shareholders would like to know when restrictions expire, determine the float, and obtain the entire share structure. Why is this acceptable to ENTI, what's the benefit, and if not acceptable, when will it change?

[] Having visitors on-site endears them to the power, tools, editing capacity & edited videos featured there. Moreover, full-length videos allow a websurfer to explore the medium/site & become acquainted with it's features/capabilities/store(s) & explore a trial membership per se. What are the stumbling blocks inherent in having full video clips (even if they can ONLY be viewed, let's say 10times before they then must be bought). An agreement of this sort allows some competition with YouTube, Vevo & the like such that other features and revenues can be made on these visits while exposing users to revenue streams/advertising/etc. Put plainly, the website can be sold on them!!! But, not as it is currently constituted with 30sec clips. What can be done about that?



For 1) We asked if the float could be released, and asked about the expiration of restricted shares possibly being sold into the market right now. We also asked the CEO to affirm that we should not expect a reverse split. For 2) We asked if we could expect higher resolution videos as well as if we could expect full length videos for paying members, and noted that a platinum member reported he was able to watch full length videos, and asked if that information would be publicized.

Hopefully if there is a next time you can feel more included.

Best,

CD