I wonder why to perpetrate fact-twisting
as many trained legally individuals do?
As you well know, a scam is legally defined as: FRAUD
The court accepted definition of fraud aka "scam" is:
"A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury."
Fraud needs to prove the following:
"Showing that the defendant's actions involved five separate elements:
1) a false statement of a material fact,
2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue,
3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim,
4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement, and
5) injury to the alleged victim as a result."
Now, this is in the EEUU, but In Costa Rica is a different game. Fraud in Costa Rica is defined as an intended action. Thus, who can prove intent, to twist the twist in CR to prove intent by part of an enterprise is even more difficult. Reason why CR is known as crook's heaven.
The case against TATF is building itself little by little.
In all four elements of fraudulent action seem to be fitting to TATF tactics.
I love your tactics, blame the injured of fraud.
I WONDER!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED TO THE QUESTIONS I ASK YOU?
AI
