Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:16:29 AM
[] Why has the company chosen a T/A, or instructed the T/A, NOT to provide R/S info? Shareholders would like to know when restrictions expire, determine the float, and obtain the entire share structure. Why is this acceptable to ENTI, what's the benefit, and if not acceptable, when will it change?
[] Having visitors on-site endears them to the power, tools, editing capacity & edited videos featured there. Moreover, full-length videos allow a websurfer to explore the medium/site & become acquainted with it's features/capabilities/store(s) & explore a trial membership per se. What are the stumbling blocks inherent in having full video clips (even if they can ONLY be viewed, let's say 10times before they then must be bought). An agreement of this sort allows some competition with YouTube, Vevo & the like such that other features and revenues can be made on these visits while exposing users to revenue streams/advertising/etc. Put plainly, the website can be sold on them!!! But, not as it is currently constituted with 30sec clips. What can be done about that?
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM