InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 4429
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2010

Re: DonShimoda post# 1031

Sunday, 07/25/2010 2:50:22 PM

Sunday, July 25, 2010 2:50:22 PM

Post# of 80490
Don, thank you for that response. It raises some new areas of consideration for me, who is just learning the considerations behind trial design.

I did not quite realize how different the PIII trial is from the PII and how the design of the PIII trial really is based on deep interpetation of the PII results, as there is no direct comparison, as you point out.

It also underscores the explanations for the extended lengths of the PIII trials as the pt are stable. As such, it could take some time to identify any change in condition, placebo or rida treated.

I'm hoping Ariad did identify which pt it could help the most. It all illustrates the quite complicated trial design puzzle to determine what gives any drug the best chance for approval and for what purpose.

Stated endpoints notwithstanding, as DNDN Provenge was approved for what seems a quite modest improvement over no treatment, you'd have to believe Rida should have a reasonably good shot.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.