InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 4398
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/22/2009

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 75872

Sunday, 07/25/2010 10:40:02 AM

Sunday, July 25, 2010 10:40:02 AM

Post# of 103340
It is amazing to me how your data is presented.

First volume is used. When volume goes against what you try to present, you state it is made up volume.

L2 is used, but when it is pointed out that L2 isn't reliable and it is demonstrated how unreliable it is, we should simply ignore that.

Complaints are sent to the SEC with the allusion that they are doing something regarding them and are so happy to be getting the simple data that is being sent to them. Then when it is pointed out that the SEC does not forward complaints made based off of level 2, we should believe something different.

The shorting data that you present flies in the face of math when compared to the bi monthly short interest report, but of course, disregard that data also.

The FTD's don't exist, so of course we are told to ignore that data because well it again doesn't fit.

Expo's financials for the first half of 2009 and all of 2008 sucked, but of course we should ignore that data because of the "macro environment".

The TA says the A/S is 2 billion, but of course we should ignore that data, because you have counted at least 2.4 billion shares.