go listen to that clip closely...there was no briefing ever filed that refers to what Justin mentions when he says the 30 billion as presented in is briefing. Plus listen to the FDIC's response when he says when confronted about the 30 billion...
Nelson only mentions the 30 billion once...and immediately after he did the FDIC layer gets up to speak, I mean immediately, then the judge issues her ruling. No one confronts J. Nelson about his damn 30 billion comment like the FDIC lawyer states, that is not in open court. This leads me to believe that he briefed the party in chambers about this 30 billion and made a comment about it in open court along with (PART/SOME) rationale as to how that figure can be validated...i.e JPM first quarter after acquisition. IMHO, this is just one of several ways/reasons they can validate this amount, and I think J. Nelson was just throwing the weakest one out there to get the FDIC's feathers ruffled. NOTICE THE JPM LAWYER did not say one word during the whole hearing...and I wonder why
I didn't catch the reference and exchange in court but after listening to this portion of the hearing I caught some interesting things and tidbits of information almost like they were eloquently and mysteriously giving us clues and breadcrumbs to show us the light! So listen carefully to that piece that was posted at the end with J. Nelson and the FDIC exchange right before the Judges ruling!
