InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2863
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2009

Re: VR-Strategy_Advisor post# 10231

Thursday, 07/22/2010 11:25:54 PM

Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:25:54 PM

Post# of 19695
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M SAYING. I DIDN'T SOLICIT THE EMAIL FROM IPWG'S ATTORNEY. I'M NOT IN THE HABIT OF SOLICITING THREATS !!!
IN THE EMAIL, THE LAWYER REVEALED DEFINITE INSIDER INFO --- WHICH I HAVE NOT MADE PUBLIC, NOR HAVE I ACTED UPON IT. THIS EMAIL WAS SENT TO SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE SH GROUP. SO IPWG'S LAWYER MADE THREATS TO AND DISSEMINATED INSIDER INFO TO SEVERAL IPWG SHAREHOLDERS.

I DON'T THINK IT IS A NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE IF I SUMMARIZE THE THREAT --- HE SAID THAT IF OUR SH GROUP CONTINUED OUR ACTION WE COULD BE SUED. PRETTY PATHETIC WHEN A COMPANY LAWYER THREATENS SHAREHOLDERS FOR EXERCISING THEIR RIGHTS. I THOUGHT SHAREHOLDERS HAD THE RIGHT TO CHANGE MANAGEMENT OR REQUEST A LOOK AT THE BOOKS IF THEY COULD MUSTER A MAJORITY INTEREST.

BTW, THIS GENIUS WHO IS OUR LAWYER ALSO TOLD US THE COMPANY WAS A PRIVATE COMPANY. ONE OF OUR GROUP HAD TO EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PRIVATE COMPANY, AND A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY.

I ALSO HEARD, THAT WHEN ONE OF THE SH GROUP QUESTIONED HIM --- WHO WAS HE WORKING FOR --- THE SHAREHOLDERS OR MANAGEMENT --- HE LAUGHED AND SAID YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING. SOMEONE BETTER TELL THE LAWYER ITS THE SHAREHOLDERS WHO OWN THE COMPANY, NOT MANAGEMENT --- AND IT'S A PUBLIC COMPANY, NOT PRIVATE. HIS ARROGANCE WAS ONLY SURPASSED BY HIS IGNORANCE.

I DON'T KNOW WHY I HAVE THIS FEELING, BUT I HAVE A FEELING PETER WAS DICTATING THIS LETTER TO THE LAWYER --- JUST SOUNDED SO MUCH LIKE SOMETHING PETER WOULD DO --- THREATEN SHAREHOLDERS & THINK THE COMPANY IS HIS PRIVATE COMPANY. GO FIGURE --- WHY WOULD I HAVE THAT FEELING ???