No problem. I have to listen to the part of the audio to which you are referring to.
My thoughts are that the adversary came to a reality that an Examiner was going to be appointed. The fight shifted from "no examiner" to "narrowing the scope" of the examiner. This was the last venue left to fight -- orally. (Could this be what you are referring to? re: making it personal towards Nelson that you mentioned?)
If the adversary could not defeat in oral arguments, then a "reorganization" of the adversary's "game plan" starts out of court.
This is essentially moving from Plan A (no examiner), to Plan B (narrow scope of examiner), to Plan C (new game plan, i.e. settlement numbers? Delay? Only speculating here).
As far as an Examiner, we do not know what else he will uncover other than what were the assets and the good faith "settlement," which is the subject of the DS/POR. Who knows, in some aspects, it may partially work against us, however, I am leaning towards JPM/FDIC do not want something to come to light or made public, which would be the driving force of numbers being thrown at EC.
Just my thoughts.
I have to get to work, busy day.
Have a nice nice william48.
